On 04/03/09 14:27, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Ole Solberg <[email protected]> writes:
The following failures were seen:
Thanks for the report, Ole. I have one question, please see below.
DERBY-2478 (CLOSED!?)
Do you have the stack trace for this error? The report seems to have
been truncated:
http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.5.1.0_RC/jvm1.6-64/testing/testlog/sparc/757599-suitesAll_diff.txt
This happened in derbyall, see:
http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.5.1.0_RC/jvm1.6-64/testing/testlog/sparc/757599-derbyall_diff.txt
but the first diff is
********* Diff file
derbyall/derbynetmats/DerbyNet/derbynetmats/holdCursorIJ.diff
*** Start: holdCursorIJ jdk1.6.0_06 DerbyNet derbynetmats:derbynetmats
2009-04-02 23:25:38 ***
115 del
< ERROR X0X95: Operation 'DROP TABLE' cannot be performed on object 'T1'
because there is an open ResultSet dependent on that object.
115a115
> ERROR X0X95: DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -1, SQLSTATE: X0X95,
SQLERRMC: DROP TABLET1X0X95.S
116a117
> ERROR 58009: Execution failed due to a distribution protocol error
that caused deallocation of the conversation. The requested command
encountered an unarchitected and implementation specific condition for
which there was no architected message.
120 del
< ERROR X0X95: Operation 'DROP TABLE' cannot be performed on object 'T1'
because there is an open ResultSet dependent on that object.
so my automatic matching probably fooled me here...
--
Ole Solberg, Database Technology Group,
Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway
