Bryan Pendleton wrote:
It seems like it would be useful for the Hudson build to build the docs,
even if it doesn't publish them to the website, just to verify that they
build successfully after each change.

Similarly, if this isn't already occurring, it would be useful for the
Hudson build to build Javadoc. I know that I often forget to verify the
Javadoc build when checking a patch.

Hi Bryan,

That's a good idea, and I'll give it a try.
The only thing needed (I think) is that the ant script returns with an error code when an error is found in the JavaDoc. Hopefully, that's how it is already. We have the choice of running this together with the build itself, or as a separate job. The downside by running it together with the build itself is that a build error will hide the JavaDoc error.

Expect me to introduce a temporary JavaDoc error in the near future :)


--
Kristian

thanks,

bryan


Reply via email to