[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-4193:
---------------------------------

    Issue & fix info: [High Value Fix]

> ASSERT FAILED Scan position already saved with multi-threaded 
> insert/update/delete 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4193
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.5.1.1, 10.6.0.0
>         Environment: Windows XP, IBM 1.6 SR6, Sun  1.6.0_01-b06
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>             Fix For: 10.5.1.2, 10.6.0.0
>
>         Attachments: btreemaxscancomments.diff, d4193-1a.diff, d4193-1b.diff, 
> d4193-1c.diff, ScanPosSaved.java, ScanPosSaved.java
>
>
> The attached program ScanPosSaved.java produces the error below, fairly 
> quickly.  
> The program has three threads, one doing inserts into a table with an 
> identity column, one updating the row with the maximum id, one deleting the 
> row with the maximum id.
> To reproduce, run >java ScanPosSaved  and <ctrl> <c> out of the program after 
> you get the error.
> I saw this 10.5 and trunk sane builds but did not see it on 10.4.  With the 
> insane build of 10.5.1.1 (RC2) I did not see any symptoms right away, so 
> don't know how serious an issue this is for insane builds.
> org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.AssertFailure: ASSERT FAILED Scan 
> position already saved
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.SanityManager.ASSERT(SanityManager.java:120)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.BTreeScan.savePositionAndReleasePage(BTreeScan.java:2148)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.BTreeScan.savePositionAndReleasePage(BTreeScan.java:2212)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.BTreeRowPosition.saveMeAndReleasePage(BTreeRowPosition.java:128)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.index.B2IRowLocking3.lockRowOnPage(B2IRowLocking3.java:295)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.index.B2IRowLocking3._lockScanRow(B2IRowLocking3.java:599)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.index.B2IRowLockingRR.lockScanRow(B2IRowLockingRR.java:105)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.BTreeMaxScan.positionAtStartPosition(BTreeMaxScan.java:347)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.BTreeMaxScan.fetchMax(BTreeMaxScan.java:434)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.btree.index.B2I.fetchMaxOnBTree(B2I.java:739)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.RAMTransaction.fetchMaxOnBtree(RAMTransaction.java:1078)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.LastIndexKeyResultSet.openCore(LastIndexKeyResultSet.java:189)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.ProjectRestrictResultSet.openCore(ProjectRestrictResultSet.java:168)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.ScalarAggregateResultSet.openCore(ScalarAggregateResultSet.java:133)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.ProjectRestrictResultSet.openCore(ProjectRestrictResultSet.java:168)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.execute.BasicNoPutResultSetImpl.open(BasicNoPutResultSetImpl.java:245)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericPreparedStatement.executeStmt(GenericPreparedStatement.java:416)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericPreparedStatement.execute(GenericPreparedStatement.java:297)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeStatement(EmbedStatement.java:1235)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.execute(EmbedStatement.java:625)
>       at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeQuery(EmbedStatement.java:152)
>       at ScanPosSaved.updateOperation(ScanPosSaved.java:62)
>       at ScanPosSaved$3.run(ScanPosSaved.java:17)
> I discovered this when trying to get a smaller repro for DERBY-4181, but I 
> think it is a different issue, because it reproduces on multiple jvms and 
> does not reproduce on 10.4.  The assertion was added with DERBY-2991.  Knut 
> could you perhaps assess how serious this is?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to