[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727698#action_12727698
 ] 

Suran Jayathilaka commented on DERBY-712:
-----------------------------------------

Hi Rick,

I changed the DataDictionaryImpl.dropAllPermDescriptors() method as follows by 
changing the index in the ti.getRow() call to 3, which is the index of the 
object Id. I think it should behave correctly now. If this is correct, I will 
attach the revised patch when the tests are finished. 

public void dropAllPermDescriptors(UUID objectID, TransactionController tc)
            throws StandardException {
        TabInfoImpl ti = getNonCoreTI(SYSPERMS_CATALOG_NUM);
        SYSPERMSRowFactory rf = (SYSPERMSRowFactory) ti.getCatalogRowFactory();
        DataValueDescriptor objIdOrderable;
        ExecRow curRow;
        PermissionsDescriptor perm;

        // In Derby authorization mode, permission catalogs may not be present
        if (!usesSqlAuthorization)
            return;

        /* Use objIDOrderable in both start and stop position for scan. */
        objIdOrderable = getIDValueAsCHAR(objectID);

        /* Set up the start/stop position for the scan */
        ExecIndexRow keyRow = exFactory.getIndexableRow(1);
        keyRow.setColumn(1, objIdOrderable);

        while ((curRow = ti.getRow(tc, keyRow, 3)) != null) {
            perm = (PermDescriptor) rf.buildDescriptor(curRow, 
(TupleDescriptor) null, this);
            removePermEntryInCache(perm);

            // Build new key based on UUID and drop the entry as we want to drop
            // only this row
            ExecIndexRow uuidKey;
            uuidKey = rf.buildIndexKeyRow(rf.PERMS_UUID_IDX_NUM, perm);
            ti.deleteRow(tc, uuidKey, rf.PERMS_UUID_IDX_NUM);
        }
    }

Also, when I ran org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.derbynet._Suite, I 
did not see the failure which you mentioned. I am currently running suites.All 
and will check if there are remaining test failures.

Thanks!
Suran

> Support for sequences
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-712
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-712
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>         Environment: feature request 
>            Reporter: Tony Dahbura
>            Assignee: Suran Jayathilaka
>             Fix For: 10.6.0.0
>
>         Attachments: altertable.diff, catalogs_a.patch, catalogs_b.patch, 
> catalogs_c.patch, catalogs_d.patch, catalogs_e.patch, SequenceGenerator.html
>
>
> Would like to see support added for sequences.  This would permit a select 
> against the sequence to always obtain a ever increasing/decreasing value.  
> The identity column works fine but there are times for applications where the 
> application needs to obtain the sequence number and use it prior to the 
> database write.  Subsequent calls to the table/column would result in a new 
> number on each call.
> SQL such as the following:
> SELECT NEXT VALUE FOR sequence_name FROM sometable ; would result in a next 
> value.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to