Kathey Marsden wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
I am getting lots of warnings like the one below with the
ant snapshot target when trying to make the release.
[tar] Entry:
db-derby-snapshot-debug-10.5.2.0-794445/javadoc/publishedapi/jdbc4/org/apache/derby/vti/package-tree.
html longer than 100 characters.
Is this an issue?
Thanks
Kathey
I guess this is an issue: If I go ahead and do ant release and then try
[C:/tmp] tar tvf db-derby-10.5.2.0-bin.tar | grep vti | grep package
I see the files there, but also @LongLink messages. It's been a
while since I made a release candidate but don't remember this problem.
tar: blocksize = 20
USTAR Version
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
././@LongLink: Unknown file type field value `L'
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 1076 Jul 15 15:55
db-derby-10.5.2.0-bin/javadoc/jdbc3/org/apache/derby/vti/package-
frame.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 10032 Jul 15 15:55
db-derby-10.5.2.0-bin/javadoc/jdbc3/org/apache/derby/vti/package-
summary.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 6563 Jul 15 15:55
db-derby-10.5.2.0-bin/javadoc/jdbc3/org/apache/derby/vti/package-
tree.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 1076 Jul 15 15:55
db-derby-10.5.2.0-bin/javadoc/jdbc4/org/apache/derby/vti/package-
frame.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 10032 Jul 15 15:55
db-derby-10.5.2.0-bin/javadoc/jdbc4/org/apache/derby/vti/package-
summary.html
-rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 6563 Jul 15 15:55
db-derby-10.5.2.0-bin/javadoc/jdbc4/org/apache/derby/vti/package-
tree.html
The @LongLink messages were with mks tar. With cygwin tar I don't see
the errors with tar tvf. Based on the discussion in DERBY-2839 this
is to be expected with the src tarball but not the bin distribution.
Advice welcome.
Hi Kathey,
At this point, my only advice would be to use GNU tar.
What have the previous release managers done?
--
Kristian
Kathey
