+1 It seems good to go for me. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Ole Solberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > based on the results reported in > http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenFiveTwoPlatformTesting . > > On 07/28/09 23:35, Kathey Marsden wrote: > >> Kathey Marsden wrote: >> >>> The 10.5.2.0 release candidate is ready for testing. It is available at: >>> http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/derby10.5.2.0.794445/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ekmarsden/derby10.5.2.0.794445/> >>> >> . > . > >> >>> I am going to postpone the close of polls a day until Thursday July 30, >> 2009 at 9am PDT. >> > . > . > >> Thanks >> >> Kathey >> >> >> > > I have not created the traditional summary report for the tests I ran (will > do that when back), but this is a very short summary: > > derbyall, suites.All > 1.4: NONE (22 OS/JVM platforms) > 1.5: NONE (22 OS/JVM platforms) > 1.6: After rerun: Only one DERBY-4186 plus one case of "Server shutdown > failed". The last intermittent/infra. (23 OS/JVM platforms) > 1.6-64: DERBY-3819 (plus known repl.test failures on zones machines) (13 > OS/JVM platforms). > > Large Data Volume test: NONE > > Long Time Test: NONE - still running (10.5.1.1 ran with no issues for 3 > months when shut down.) > > JDBC 3.0 CTS: NONE (3 OS/JVM platforms) > > Systemtest : MailJdbc NetworkServer, w/derby.properties: 1 deadlock. > Systemtest : MailJdbc embedded, w/derby.properties: deadlocks > Systemtest : StTest (single table test embedded): deadlocks, disk full. > Systemtest : NsTest (single table test network server): NONE > Systemtest : OrderEntry: NONE (DERBY-4169 on 10.5.1.1) > > > -- > Ole Solberg, Database Technology Group, > Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway >
