Kathey Marsden wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:

I don't really care what we call it. There is no reason that the release notes have to describe the delta between the current release and the immediately preceding one. I can build a 10.5.3.0 whose release notes describes its delta from 10.5.1.1.


I think that would be ok but would prefer if there were separate sections for each release. That way it would be clear where DERBY-4331 was fixed.

Kathey

I'm planning to highlight the small number of extra bugs which were fixed after 10.5.2.1--perhaps just by making them bold or maybe by separating them out into their own section as you suggest. That should be useful for the small number of users who will be upgrading from 10.5.2.1 and for our own archeology in the future.

Regards,
-Rick

Reply via email to