[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785357#action_12785357
]
Kim Haase commented on DERBY-3605:
----------------------------------
Looks fine to me -- thanks, Bryan.
> Remove confusing statement "If there is an index defined on the table, the
> table can be renamed."
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3605
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3605
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.3.2.1
> Environment: N/A
> Reporter: Oleksandr Alesinskyy
> Assignee: Bryan Pendleton
> Attachments: docs.diff, rrefsqljrenametablestatement.html
>
>
> Remove following restriction for "RENAME TABLE" statement:
> "If there is an index defined on the table, the table can be renamed."
> I really do not see any valid reasons (except, probably not very wise
> implementation) for existence this restriction. And it may come very
> inconvinient if table to be renamed has an index(ses) referenced by foreign
> keys from other tables.
> Regards,
> Oleksandr
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
