Hi All, Could anyone please let me know how can I unsubscribe from this list?
Thanks , --Srinivas -----Original Message----- From: Myrna van Lunteren [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: javadoc errors anyone? On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Knut Anders Hatlen <[email protected]> wrote: > Myrna van Lunteren <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Myrna, >>> >>> These look like more fallout from a large submission I committed on Friday >>> (subversion revision 899733 for DERBY-4491). I have fixed the DRDAConnThread >>> javadoc warning with revision 901219. >>> >>> I don't see the second diagnostic ("Failed with following errors") when I >>> build the javadoc. What command are you using to build the docs? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Rick >>> >>> Myrna van Lunteren wrote: >>>> >> I apologize - I'm using a slightly hokey homegrown utility that checks >> on expected output of the build by checking each line against a list >> of lines to ignore as 'ok'. >> So that's where that line came from, not ant javadoc at all. >> >> This was (after doing ant -Ddeprecation=off -Dsane=false all, twice) >> the result from >> ant -Ddeprecation=off buildjars. The output contains this section: >> derbynetjar: >> [echo] Beginning derbynet.jar insane build >> [echo] creating net.list >> [java] SANITY >>> /org/apache/derby/impl/drda/DDMWriter.class >> [echo] creating new net.properties file >> That line with SANITY is not on my list of lines to be ignored, and >> so, it is new. >> It's the only occurrence of that line in my build output, and looking >> at SanityManager.java I don't understand why this would come up in the >> build output... >> Any ideas? > > classlister.java prints this warning if insane jars contain the > SanityManager class. One of the commits Rick mentioned above introduced > a call to a SanityManager method in insane jars, which caused the > SanityManager class to be included also in the insane jars, hence the > warning. I think Rick backed out the changes that caused it. Or are you > still seeing the warning? > > -- > Knut Anders > Well, yes. I synced up to 901399 and am (still) seeing this. Maybe you're referring to Rick's fixing a sealing violation with revision 899819... (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=899819) Maybe this is then another instance of the same? Myrna This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorised review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email or any action taken in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
