Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> writes:
I agree that most developers won't care about this file. It is
interesting archeology for release managers, though.
The most interesting thing in the list is that the 10.5.3.0 artifacts
are broken, and that 10.5.3.0_1 should be used instead. I think this is
something that would interest our users too, which may suggest that we
shouldn't hide this information in the source repository?
I agree that users would be interested in knowing that 10.5.3.0_1 is the
good distribution and 10.5.3.0 has been deprecated. Where would a
typical maven user expect to find that information? I don't use maven
much, so I don't think I could answer that question.
Thanks,
-Rick
