[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12920225#action_12920225
 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-4741:
--------------------------------------

Thanks, Knut and Lily. 
Ok, good to know that there is an interrupt involved when mailjdbc fails.  
Lily, also please note that Derby151Test is its present form will probably 
change when I start to actually throw Derby exceptions when interrupts are 
detected. So far, they are mostly only noted in InterruptStatus (thread local) 
and normal operation continues. The latest patch has started to throw 
exceptions for interrupts while waiting for locks, though, cf. mods in 
LockSet.java/ConcurrentLockSet.java, since this seemed the obvious place to 
throw anyway.

> Make Derby work reliably in the presence of thread interrupts
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4741
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.1.4, 10.3.2.1, 10.3.3.0, 
> 10.4.1.3, 10.4.2.0, 10.5.1.1, 10.5.2.0, 10.5.3.0, 10.6.1.0
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
>         Attachments: derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks.diff, 
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks.stat, 
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits.diff, 
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits.stat, derby-4741-nio-container+log.diff, 
> derby-4741-nio-container+log.stat, derby-4741-nio-container-2.diff, 
> derby-4741-nio-container-2.log, derby-4741-nio-container-2.stat, 
> derby-4741-nio-container-2b.diff, derby-4741-nio-container-2b.stat, 
> derby.log, xsbt0.log.gz
>
>
> When not executing on a small device VM, Derby has been using the Java NIO 
> classes java.nio.clannel.* for file io.
> If thread is interrupted while executing blocking IO operations in NIO, the 
> ClosedByInterruptException will get thrown. Unfortunately, Derby isn't 
> current architected to retry and complete such operations (before passing on 
> the interrupt), so the Derby database can be left in an inconsistent state 
> and we therefore have to return a database level error. This means the 
> applications can no longer access the database without a shutdown and reboot 
> including a recovery.
> It would be nice if Derby could somehow detect and finish IO operations 
> underway when thread interrupts happen before passing the exception on to the 
> application. Derby embedded is sometimes embedded in applications that use 
> Thread.interrupt to stop threads.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to