[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12921987#action_12921987
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4741:
-------------------------------------------
Oops... Clean trunk wasn't 8.5% faster than the patched version. It was 7.8%
faster. What I should have said, was that the patched version was 8.5% slower
than clean trunk.
I ran the micro benchmark through a profiler, but I didn't see anything there
to explain a ~8% degradation. I did see more time spent in ThreadLocal.get()
(no surprise there...), but only enough to explain one or two percent, roughly
what Dag saw. I'll try to dig a little more.
> Make Derby work reliably in the presence of thread interrupts
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4741
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4741
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Store
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.1.4, 10.3.2.1, 10.3.3.0,
> 10.4.1.3, 10.4.2.0, 10.5.1.1, 10.5.2.0, 10.5.3.0, 10.6.1.0
> Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
> Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
> Attachments: derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks+throws.diff,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks+throws.stat,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks-2.diff,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks-2.stat,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks.diff,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks.stat,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits.diff,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits.stat, derby-4741-nio-container+log.diff,
> derby-4741-nio-container+log.stat, derby-4741-nio-container-2.diff,
> derby-4741-nio-container-2.log, derby-4741-nio-container-2.stat,
> derby-4741-nio-container-2b.diff, derby-4741-nio-container-2b.stat,
> derby.log, derby.log, MicroAPITest.java, xsbt0.log.gz
>
>
> When not executing on a small device VM, Derby has been using the Java NIO
> classes java.nio.clannel.* for file io.
> If thread is interrupted while executing blocking IO operations in NIO, the
> ClosedByInterruptException will get thrown. Unfortunately, Derby isn't
> current architected to retry and complete such operations (before passing on
> the interrupt), so the Derby database can be left in an inconsistent state
> and we therefore have to return a database level error. This means the
> applications can no longer access the database without a shutdown and reboot
> including a recovery.
> It would be nice if Derby could somehow detect and finish IO operations
> underway when thread interrupts happen before passing the exception on to the
> application. Derby embedded is sometimes embedded in applications that use
> Thread.interrupt to stop threads.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
