On 2/4/11 4:00 PM, Lily Wei wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Rick Hillegas <[email protected]>
*To:* [email protected]
*Sent:* Fri, February 4, 2011 5:30:20 AM
*Subject:* Re: should largeDataTests run?
On 2/2/11 4:59 PM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had some old scripts that run the largeDataTests suite. And the
> trunk run appears to be hanging. I haven't looked at it for a long
> time (months), so I'm not sure when this started happening...
> Also, this same script runs on 4 different branches - (trunk, 10.7,
> 10.5, 10.3), and it doesn't look good for any of those.
>
> The sun runs of largeDataTests suite also seems to have discontinued
itself.
>
> Has anyone been successful in running these recently?
>
> Thx,
> Myrna
>
Hi Myrna,
I think these tests were run successfully as part of vetting 10.6.1:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenSixOnePlatformTesting . It does not
appear that the tests were run during 10.6.2 or 10.7.1 vetting.
Regards,
-Rick
Hi Rick:
I don't think this test was run during 10.6.2 Does this bring up a
necessary a "to run" test list before
we vote for an official release?
Thanks,
Lily
Hi Lily,
The large data volume tests are already on the checklist which voters
consult before vetting a release:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/ReleaseVettingChecklist. It wouldn't
hurt to remind people about that checklist when we call a vote. We could
also wire a copy of that checklist into each release page. Before doing
that for our next release (10.8.1), we might want to add other items to
the checklist.
Thanks,
-Rick
