On 04/19/2011 02:39 PM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
On 4/19/2011 8:37 AM, Lily Wei wrote:
Hi David:
I tried with an empty directory for the same test with your fix. It also failed for me with the patch.

So it sounds specifically related to the patch. I wonder if at whatever point these objects are supposed to be dropped, there are open result sets so it doesn't actually get dropped. Is there anything in the derby.log about maybe not being able to drop the Phase table because of open result sets?




Only thing of interest is this, nothing related to the Phase table:

Sun Apr 17 04:57:15 EST 2011 : Execution failed because of Permanent Agent Error: SVRCOD = 40; RDBNAM = srvdscreateshutdowndb1;create=true; diagnostic msg = ASSERT FAILED pbsd is not expected to be null org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAProtocolException: Execution failed because of Permanent Agent Error: SVRCOD = 40; RDBNAM = srvdscreateshutdowndb1;create=true; diagnostic msg = ASSERT FAILED pbsd is not expected to be null at org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAProtocolException.newAgentError(DRDAProtocolException.java:339) at org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAConnThread.sendUnexpectedException(DRDAConnThread.java:8378) at org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAConnThread.handleException(DRDAConnThread.java:8329) at org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAConnThread.run(DRDAConnThread.java:319)
Sun Apr 17 04:57:15 EST 2011 : ASSERT FAILED pbsd is not expected to be null
org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.AssertFailure: ASSERT FAILED pbsd is not expected to be null at org.apache.derby.shared.common.sanity.SanityManager.ASSERT(SanityManager.java:120) at org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAConnThread.writePBSD(DRDAConnThread.java:2726) at org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAConnThread.processCommands(DRDAConnThread.java:1044) at org.apache.derby.impl.drda.DRDAConnThread.run(DRDAConnThread.java:294)

Reply via email to