Hi Bryan,
These sound like good changes to me. A couple comments inline...
On 1/28/12 9:01 AM, Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Following-up my own message, I see that there is already a junit.jar
in the svn distribution.
So I guess I don't need to worry about downloading junit 3.8.2.
A couple notes about the building source docs:
1) http://db.apache.org/derby/dev/derby_source.html, in the section
"Software required to build Derby", seems to say that I need Java JDK 1.5, but
I appear to be successful using JDK 1.6, so perhaps that should say
"Java 5 OR Java 6"?
Or Java 7. How about "any JDK at level Java 5 or higher"?
2) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/derby/code/trunk/BUILDING.html, should
we remove "You can get JUnit 3.8.2 here. ", since that no longer seems
to be correct?
That sounds right to me. The junit jar is not in our subversion
repository but is downloaded by the build. Kristian's response to your
other message shows us where to get the jar if the build messes up:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/junit/junit/3.8.2/junit-3.8.2.jar
3)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/derby/code/trunk/java/testing/README.htm?revision=1102688&view=co,
should we remove the sub-paragraph in "set $CLASSPATH to include the
following jars: "
which talks about "db2jcc.jar and db2jcc_license_c.jar" -- we no
longer use those jars, right?
Maybe Kathey or Myrna can verify this.
Thanks,
-Rick
thanks,
bryan
