[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13270403#comment-13270403
 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-5747:
--------------------------------------

I agree 1) is a valid use case, although I'd probably prefer something like 
DISABLE_USER for such a functionality. Understood, a cascading delete is 
non-trivial. Options: introduce an extra argument to DROP_:USER(<user>, <mode>) 
where <mode> could be CASCADE later, or for now, KEEP to let schema(s) owned by 
the user hang around. A new ALTER SCHEMA could be used for that purpose later. 
I think the new mechanism should be viewed as *more* than just adding and 
dropping passwords, although that's mainly what the current code does in n 
addition to introducing a user auth id repository. But I think we should try to 
design this in such a way that we can extend the functionality in a later 
increment to encompass management of users in a broader sense. If so, I think 
we should retain the syntax CREATE_USER..
                
> Native user authentication: Docs do not describe what happens to schema and 
> its SQL objects on SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_DROP_USER call
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5747
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5747
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation, Services
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: repro2.sh
>
>
> Currently, the schema and the objects remain after the user is dropped, cf. 
> repro2.sh attached.
> The authorization id of the schema of the dropped user is still that id 
> (dangling) after DROP.
> Perhaps ownership should revert to the DBO when a user is dropped, or should 
> DROP USER do a cascade delete?
> There is no way currently to change the ownership of the schema to another 
> user.
> At the very least we should document what happens.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to