Knut Anders Hatlen created DERBY-5883:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: Simplify JSR-169 implementation class tree
                 Key: DERBY-5883
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5883
             Project: Derby
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: JDBC
    Affects Versions: 10.10.0.0
            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
            Priority: Minor


The JSR-169 interface is a subset of JDBC 3.0, but still the JDBC 3.0 
implementation classes do not extend the JSR-169 implementation classes. 
Instead, the JSR-169 and JDBC 3.0 implementation classes extend a common base 
class. The reason for this structure, is that the JSR-169 compile targets used 
to be optional, so the JDBC 3.0 classes could not depend on them.

For example, the class javadoc comment for EmbedResultSet169 says:

 * ResultSet implementation for JSR169.
 * Adds no functionality to its (abstract) parent class.
 * If Derby could be compiled against JSR169 that the parent
 * class could be the concrete class for the environment.
 * Just like for the JDBC 2.0 specific classes.
 * Until that is possible (ie. easily downloadable J2ME/CDC/Foundation/JSR169
 * jar files, this class is required and is only compiled by an optional target.

Since the JSR-169 code is no longer optional, we should do as the comment 
suggests, and use the base class directly instead. This would allow us to 
simplify the class tree.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to