[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Knut Anders Hatlen closed DERBY-3275.
-------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed
    
> Mismatch between comments and actual use of initialSize parameter in 
> CacheFactory and Clock
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3275
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3275
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Services
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.1.3
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: derby_triage10_5_2
>             Fix For: 10.10.0.0
>
>         Attachments: javadoc.diff
>
>
> The javadoc for 
> org.apache.derby.iapi.services.cache.CacheFactory.newCacheManager() describes 
> the initialSize parameter like this:
>               @param initialSize      The number of initial holder objects 
> that will be created
> And org.apache.derby.impl.services.cache.Clock's constructor says the 
> following:
>               @param initialSize the initial number of cachable object this 
> cache
>               holds.
>               @param maximumSize the maximum size of the cache.  The cache 
> may grow
>               from initialSize to maximumSize if the cache policy notices 
> that there
>               is not enough free buffers availiable.  Once the cache hits 
> maximumSize
>               it will not grow.  If the cache is full, an exception will be 
> thrown
> However, when Clock is created, it does not populate the cache with "holder 
> objects" or "cacheable [objects]". It only uses the initialSize to specify 
> the initial capacity of the HashMap and the ArrayList that are created.
> Either the code should be changed so that it's in line with the comments, or 
> the comments should be changed to match the code. I don't see any compelling 
> reason for changing the code, so I think I would prefer changing the comments.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to