On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Rick Hillegas <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks to Kathey for starting this release and thanks to Myrna for carrying > it forward. One comment inline... > > > On 1/29/13 2:00 PM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> After the delays in publishing because of the move to CMS of the >> website, Kathey contacted me to take over because she did not have >> time, and then I ran into troubles and a family emergency. >> But finally, I think I took all the remaining steps before the >> announcement. So, the next step is the announcement. It's a little >> strange as we made the release quite a while ago... >> >> I'd like to finish the last few steps soon, so I'd like any feedback >> by tomorrow... >> >> Here's the text I propose to send out: >> --------------------------------------------------- >> The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce maintenance release >> 10.8.3.0. This is a bug fix release following the 10.8.2.2 release. >> >> Apache Derby is a subproject of the Apache DB project. Derby is a pure >> Java relational database engine which conforms to the ISO/ANSI SQL and >> JDBC standards. Derby aims to be easy for developers and end-users to >> work with. >> >> Derby 10.8.3.0 can be obtained from the Derby download site: >> >> http://db.apache.org/derby/derby_downloads.html. >> >> Please consider upgrading earlier 10.8 releases to this. >> Note also, that all fixes in this release are also implemented in the >> 10.9.1.0 release, released earlier in 2012. > > I don't believe this is true. Many fixes were added to the 10.8 and 10.9 > branches after 10.9.1 was created. Those fixes turn up in 10.8.3 and will > turn up in 10.9.2, but they don't appear in 10.9.1. Here's one example: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5918 > > Thanks, > -Rick >> >> --------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thx, >> Myrna >> >
Thanks Rick, of course you're right. I'll just leave out reference to 10.9.1, then. Myrna
