Hi, Can you let me know about your "SQL-tester", what are the criteria you faloowd to choose the Winner.
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:31:12 +0100, Andrej Tibaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I had the same problem a couple of months ago...our project ambitiously > aims > to develop J2EE architecture with client/server enabled database and > client > (desktop) applications with embedded database. > > We invested some time and compared the following databases: Hypersonic > (HSQLDB) , Derby, MySql and PostgreSQL. We also wanted to test Daffodil DB > but at the time there was no free version. > Our project requested an embedded (or in.process) database and a > client/server database. > We wrote a "SQL-tester" which gave us our winners: > - Derby for our client Java applications > - PostgreSQL for our J2EE enterprise server > > One fact that I was in favour of is that both Derby and PostgreSQL work > together with Daffodil Replicator which became open source in october. > > With the decisions made we can now procede to develop our J2EE > application. > > I hope this can help you. > > Regards, > Andrej > > ÷-----Original Message----- > ÷From: Gaurav Anand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ÷Sent: 9. december 2004 6:00 > ÷To: derby-user@db.apache.org > ÷Subject: How to proceed ? > ÷ > ÷Hi, > > > ÷ > ÷I'm a freelance developer engaged in developing small java > ÷based applications for stock management. My application > ÷requires a DB that has data handling capacity up-to 20GB and > ÷can run in server mode. > ÷ > ÷I am on lookout for an open source/free product. Can anyone > ÷help me in selecting between Derby or Daffodil DB. Does Derby > ÷offers a network edition? > ÷ > ÷Is there anyone who had tried Daffodil DB? Experience sharing > ÷can help me take a decision. > ÷ > ÷Thanks in advance for any suggestions. > ÷ > > >
