Army, Thanks for your reply. Oops, I was obviously up way to late last night.
After I had been up for a while (and had my coffee) I realized that on my todo list I have an entry to fix one of my queries that results in a table scan so that it does not do that (my query was not written in an efficient way). It just so happens that the "action" I was using to test the upgrade to 10.1 used this query. This means it does not take a long time using my small test database but it does when I use my large test database. I was comparing the query time while using the small database and 10.0 to the query time when using the large database and 10.1. Once I compare apples to apples I see that 10.1 is actually sightly faster *not* slower. Sorry for the confusion - I am a happy 10.1 user now. I am moving that TODO item to the top of my list now:-) Thanks, Ian -- Ian Leslie - Shareware Author (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
