Thanks - I'll check it out as its the one reason I sopped using it.
David Van Couvering wrote:
FYI, GRANT/REVOKE is now implemented in 10.2. There are a lot of new
features in 10.2, including XML support, online backup, show
table/describe...
For the full list see http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/TenTwoSnapshot
David
Duncan Groenewald wrote:
I have used both and now rely on McKoiDB for the majority of work.
While it lacks one or two features it has proven to be very stable
and reliable. Derby lacks a couple of key features I needed,
especially no user access control (GRANT, REVOKE).
I found Hypersonic's persistent to be unreliable and gave up after
experiencing corruption on a number of databases.
I started a simple evaluation document to compare key features I
needed which might help. Send me your email address and I'll forward
you a copy if you would like.
Regards
Duncan
Robert Enyedi wrote:
Hi,
We have a MySQL database with around 50 tables and we are thinking
about supporting other database engines too. After studying the
options on the Java DB engine implementations, it seems that there
are two important contenders: Apache Derby and Hypersonic SQL. While
our feeling is that Hypersonic SQL is a more mature product, Derby
seems to be hyped about a lot these days and it also has quite some
history since the days of Informix and Cloudscape.
Could you please help in our decision by pointing out some
advantages and shortcomings of Apache Derby versus Hypersonic SQL?
Thanks,
Robert
