On 1/23/13 11:36 AM, Kristian Waagan wrote:
Another workaround would be to join to a temporary table which has been stuffed with the IN list tuples.On 23.01.2013 20:04, Okken,Brett wrote:I am looking at the wiki[1] and cannot determine if I should expect either of the tuple syntaxes I was attempting to work. Basically, should I log an enhancement or defect?FYI, DERBY-6049 ("Allow tuples in IN lists") [1] was filed earlier today.
Hope this helps, -Rick