On 13/06/2014 13:59, Rick Hillegas wrote:

Maybe
you can share a simplified problem which shows why this aggregation is
so tricky.

Thanks,
-Rick



Hi Rick

Thanks for your patience!
I've tried to create a minimal version that describes the problem:

create table XXX (
    XXX_ID int primary key generated always as identity
);

create table GROUPING (
    GROUPING_ID int primary key generated always as identity,
    XXX_ID INT,
constraint GROUPING2XXX foreign key (XXX_ID) references XXX (XXX_ID) on delete cascade
);

create table MAIN (
    MAIN_ID INT generated always as identity,
    GROUPING_ID INT,
    YYY_ID INT,
    NAME VARCHAR(50),
constraint MAIN2GROUPING foreign key (GROUPING_ID) references GROUPING (GROUPING_ID) on delete cascade
);

create table AGGREGATES (
    AGGREGATES_ID int generated always as identity,
    XXX_ID INT,
    YYY_ID INT,
    NAME VARCHAR(50)
);



The key parts is that AGGREGATES contains data that is grouped by YYY_ID (from MAIN) and XXX_ID (from XXX/GROUPING). So when a row from MAIN is deleted its CORRESPONDING row in AGGREGATE needs updating, which I'm doing by doing a delete followed by an INSERT. The row to delete is the one defined by the corresponding YYY_ID and XXX_ID values. And to get the corresponding XXX_ID values I need to join back to the GROUPING table. But in the case of a cascade delete caused by deletion of a row in GROUPING the row I need to join on is no longer present, as its just been deleted.

And I can't do a cascade delete from GROUPING to AGGREGATES as that would delete all AGGREGATES with the corresponding XXX_ID, not just those with the correct XXX_IDs.

I hope this is clearer!

Tim




Reply via email to