I think that good design requires a deep understanding of user needs. Experiencing those yourself is always helpful, very helpful, but you should be careful that this does not lead you to "design for yourself", and you keep a broader view.
Our users are the experienced editor on Catalan Wikipedia that creates new articles about Pritzker laureates, the anonymous reader from Kerala that has a hard time fixing a typo because the lack of input methods for Malayalam in her computer, the guy at the Tate museum reading more about Malevich on his mobile phone, an editor in Nigeria fixing and adding categories to Commons new uploads through a slow internet connection... It is seems quite hard to learn about all their needs through personal experience. Personally I have been involved in our projects in ways I could experience how our projects work in practise. For example, working on the Content Translation project I have been translating several articles myself between Spanish and Catalan Wikipedias in my spare time, but when I started working in the project I focused on learning by observing how our actual users (trying to reach a group as diverse as possible) were currently translating articles as well as going throug research info and policies about translation in Wikipedia. All this requiresbtime and you need to be deliberate on what is more effective. To design an opera house, learning how to sing may not be the most time-effective approach to learn about the needs of singers and the audience. So my advice to a new member of the design team would not be to edit as much as they can, but to learn as much as possible about our user needs and consider getting involved in the projects as one of the tools to achieve it. I think that as a team (with the formation of the user research team) and individually is something which is already in our minds, but it is always helpful to remind ourselfs. Pau El 31/12/2014 8:03, "Nick Wilson (Quiddity)" <[email protected]> escribió: > +1 > > It's also good to keep in mind that a huge chunk of being part of the > communities, is just browsing around the "backstage areas", spending time > reading and learning about the ongoing decision-processes, and > workflow-processes, and communication styles, and personal tasks that are > what keep us moving forward. Stumbling across other editors having/sharing > moments of joy, and being inspired by that. Perusing userpages, browsing > (layout!) guidelines, skimming villagepumps, checking noticeboards, and > investigating backlog piles. http://xkcd.com/214/ doesn't just apply to > articles! I had to dabble and explore in a number of areas, before I found > regular tasks that I found consistently enjoyable. > [I know a few of the design team already do this a lot, because they ask > me questions frequently! (Which I encourage). Reading doesn't leave traces > though, so it can be hard for anyone else to get a sense of who is keeping > their curiosity burning at both ends. :-) ] > > - quiddity > > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I don't know the answer to this question, but I do think it is a good >> one, and I would be in favor of anyone making product decisions being >> encouraged and given bandwidth to immerse themselves in the product they >> are making decisions about in it's raw organic form, real active wikis. >> >> I don't edit very much, mostly just on MediaWiki.org to document >> software. I certainly feel like I would benefit a lot from editing more, >> and I don't really have any good excuses why I don't. Perhaps I will try >> spending some time editing while I'm on vacation. >> >> - Trevor >> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:27 PM, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I just spent a few minutes catching up on this mailing list. I noticed >>> that Nirzar recently joined the design team. That thread seemed very >>> strange to me. It didn't answer the most basic question: does he actively >>> edit wikis? And if not, when will he be starting? >>> >>> This got me thinking about the larger issue. Are people actively editing >>> the projects? I mean making new pages, fixing typos, updating templates, >>> etc. on Wikipedia or Wikisource or Commons or another wiki? To me, it >>> seems like it would be nearly impossible to design well for these >>> projects >>> without immersing yourself in them. There's so much left to be done, even >>> on our largest projects such as the English Wikipedia, and I think we're >>> failing at communicating this. I talk to people who feel Wikipedia is >>> vast >>> and finished(!), but they're completely wrong. >>> >>> I think good design is a key component to growing the projects, but I >>> worry that more and more people are involved in name only. People should >>> be actively editing and I'm not sure that they are. So I'm left >>> wondering: >>> are people actively editing? Do people try to reserve a day a week to >>> editing? An edit a day? How do people get involved so that they can >>> understand, protect, and enhance the projects? >>> >>> I should be in San Francisco in late January and I'm hoping to meet with >>> some of you. Be assured that editing will be a topic of discussion. :-) >>> >>> MZMcBride >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Design mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Design mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Design mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design > >
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
