| Hi Brian,
See below. On Nov 13, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Brian Kirsch wrote: I think there was a miscommunication here, which ended up in the spec! Apologies for that. We only want the 'me' address to affect whether something goes into the IN collection.
So there is no specific cases for the Mail Service. If the to or cc is the me address then it appears in the 'In'. If the from or reply to (Sent Via) is the me address then it appears in the 'Out'.
Correct. No specific cases for Mail Service. Yes. Reply-to and Send via sound similar.
Ok if they are similar then how are they different? I am concerned that we are inventing work flows that standard email RFC's already address.
Perhaps I misspoke. In Chandler, the From field doesn't necessarily have a valid email address. It could just be text. The "Send via" field is what would normally go in the "From" field of a traditional email client.
In normal email clients, recipients of Chandler messages will see the email address in the "Send via" field appear in the "From field".
So it's more like, Chandler won't have a separate "Reply-to" email address, unless we add that option to the Email Account setup dialog.
For Preview: "Send via" on the Chandler item = "From" on the underlying email message = "Reply to" on the underlying email address. |
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
