Brian,
I'm now remembering the discussion and I think there was extra work
involved around automatically subscribing users to collections they
had yet to see.
More specifically, users should first have a chance to inspect the
collection before subscribing to it.
A different way to look at the issue is: When would an user want to
hand out a non-ticket [Chandler] URL versus a ticket [Chandler] URL?
As in, what if users only gave out ticket-URLs? Then, if the user is
already:
+ Logged into their Chandler Hub / Chandler Server account; and
+ Subscribed to the collection in question; then we just log them in
Also, for Preview, won't users have access to the ticket-[Chandler]
URLs from the Collection Details Dialog because Chandler Desktop will
have switched over to the new sharing format?
Mimi
On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
On 3/15/07, Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So the magic URL doesn't cover all cases. Would it be possible to
make a bookmarkable ticket-URL automatically log you in, if you've
already logged in, in that browser and you've checked [x] Remember
me.
yes, but that's not the point of contention, really. this was how we'd
originally suggested things work, but you guys explicitly told us to
continue to show the non-logged-in "ticket view" of the collection
even when the browser is already logged in to the app.
i think that when somebody clicks the pim/sharing url for a
collection, if their browser is logged into cosmo already and the user
is already subscribed to the collection, they should just get
redirected to the regular logged-in calendar view
(/cosmo/pim/calendar) with that particular collection selected.
What's the downside of this?
i can't think of one.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
