Because I didn't understand the discussions going on - it reminds me of
discussions with co-workers in my company. We have the following
situation:

a) a very visible bug appeares in one of the key applications of Ubuntu,
so that ordinary users like me will recognize it and say "what a bad job
they have done..."

b) quickly a patch is developed - the problem seems to be solved, the
application would work again as it should and has been for years, if the
patch would be applied

c) but people discuss whether to apply the patch or not, talk about
'it's just annoying', people can manually change the URLs and that it
doesn't matter that links are no longer "readable"

But perhaps I'm too simple-minded to follow...


Stefan

-- 
evolution: URLs with ampersand ("&") don't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149964
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

Reply via email to