I dissent. Explaining away this problem by comparing performance to a high-end machine does not necessarily move the bug's status to invalid. As both a documentor and developer I want to know *why* this bug is occurring.
I move that this bug's status be returned to what it was before "invalid". Anyone second that motion? -Nicholas -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: bs66 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ** Changed in: gnumeric (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Invalid -------------- Last Original message ---------------------- > > on a 3ghz computer it takes about one minute before the cpu returns to > > 0%, and as you use xubuntu you probably have a less powerful computer, -- Gnumeric help 100% loads processor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
