No I believe it doesn't contain any non-standard file. btw If it changes anything, partition is ntfs (fuse-ntfs3g), as you may have guessed. One thing what that suggests me nautilus is right is that Windows reports the same numbers!
Also when I said I think it takes largest sub-folders... I in fact took a sum of those folders from pie chart on calculator. They equal the baobab's reported size, but there is actually more within the "misc" folder. And heck! 227 GiB vs. 322 GiB (327 - 5 free) is nearly 100 GiB difference, that ain't a small thing. With all due respect, there must be a bug or something in code! I know little programming, so I might take a peek into code myself, but I am not familiar with baobab's code, so it would make a tiny difference. Now just to be clear, I might try copying the folder on ext3 partition, and see what happens. Oh Yes, I'm glad I got a response so soon! Thanks at least for that, yet! -- Baobab reports incorrect sizes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
