So I did some little tests. From now on this is definitely NOT a distro or architecture specific bug!
Bug is present: On both Interpid x86 and x86_64, and also on Fedora 10 x86_64 (and probably x86 as well) Fedora is also using Baobab 2.24.1 There is also one more thing I've noticed... it may not be really useful, but still After scanning a folder with baobab it's size is cached in memory (which is usual), though it's not the full size. Then when opening nautilus properties window, it doesn't start counting size from 0, but from cached size, up to actual size. I guess that means both use same libraries (and the same cache) and there is some files baobab overlooks, which nautilus just adds up. So really, I think if it is nothing else then it should be gnomevfs thing... I can't think of anything else now. Also need to check how deep in directory tree baobab traverse. -- Baobab reports incorrect sizes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341141 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
