Although I am a new user I wanted to add my thoughts to this bug. It might help to get this papercut completed.
To get back on to the subject; As Martin Owens said above, I think it is a good idea to look at how people use Archives. People, as I know, don't use archives to store something or to compress files together. The way those people use an archive is as an package, something they can send with their emails or upload to a webhost. If they use it as an package; Why shouldn't you just call it package? What about the current ? Call applications what they are, Applications. When I want an application I don't think of 'a wrapped or boxed object;'. Alternate suggestions...? I hope I don't repeat things to much, I just wanted to say what I think. -- "Archive Manager" doesn't mean anything if you don't know what an "archive" is https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
