> why we don't just find a tool which uses RBL's and be done with the whole thing?
Because self-learning filters generally perform a lot better after being trained, when considering both false negatives (no problem if there aren't many) and false positives (even 1 might get you in trouble). As (almost) every RBL I know causes lots of false positives, I don't think they are a good idea. Also, it would make it possible for a third party to hurt Ubuntu users badly (those RBLs are not under our control). -- Better spam filtering for evolution https://launchpad.net/bugs/9870 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
