Than you for your answers . I did some more searching (as to where to address my vision of why it is so wrong to have things that way) , and found out that you are one of the developers . So I'm thinking of how to emphasize it more , but I'll just say it - it's important to have a more flexible system (as a grid of icons launching standalone apps) , because the linux environment is user developed , and special integration into capplets , or whichever other complications you may introduce , Will mean that some applications will never appear in the system menu , and others will take their time . I know that having a unified design is important , but I'm pretty sure it's one step under functionality . One can have unified design for standalone apps - no problem ,therefore I don't see why the System settings menu had to get locked .
I know it's not the biggest problem in the universe ,but it's the first time I stumble upon a regression in development for ubuntu , and I didn't think that happens much in the linux world . That's why I'm keen to see if one (I in this case) can make a difference for the better in the development . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917767 Title: New control features are not automatically added to system settings To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/917767/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
