> 1. does on the system running also take quite some time if you do like "systemctl stop irqbalance"?
I have tested this now multiple times by stopping and starting it again and all looked fine. > 2. I'd assume that systemd concurrently stops multiple things and irqbalance > is just the last to print but not the one you are actually waiting on. Based on the above this might be true. So is it a known issue that systemd prints wrong things? I think this is an issue that should be actually fixed before tinkering around on every shutdow delay issue (also [1] blames that [2] isn't reliable enough so it would eventually also make sense to wait for [1]'s implementation). ** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729192 Title: Shutdown needs often longer than usual To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/irqbalance/+bug/1729192/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs