Ah, OK. So usage is relative to the total amount of used space, not to the filesystem size. In other words, all scans will always show 100% usage at the root. Even more, it will show 100% at the largest branch.
Is this really useful? Please note: I am actually asking, not being pedantic. I myself expected that a 100% used <whatever> would signal lack of space. But, anyway, if this is how it should work, then it is working as designed. -- baobab displays wrong totals after scanning FS https://launchpad.net/bugs/89223 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
