Hey Olivier! I looked at the librsvg upload in the queue just now. I'm a bit worried about the symbols removal in librsvg2-2. Looking at the diff:
diff -Nru librsvg-2.48.2/debian/librsvg2-2.symbols librsvg-2.48.7/debian/librsvg2-2.symbols --- librsvg-2.48.2/debian/librsvg2-2.symbols 2020-04-07 20:23:36.000000000 +0000 +++ librsvg-2.48.7/debian/librsvg2-2.symbols 2020-06-19 21:19:37.000000000 +0000 @@ -55,8 +55,6 @@ rsvg_rust_handle_get_base_url@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_get_dimensions@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_get_dimensions_sub@Base 2.46.0 - rsvg_rust_handle_get_dpi_x@Base 2.46.0 - rsvg_rust_handle_get_dpi_y@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_get_geometry_for_element@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_get_geometry_for_layer@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_get_intrinsic_dimensions@Base 2.46.0 @@ -76,8 +74,7 @@ rsvg_rust_handle_render_layer@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_set_base_gfile@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_set_base_url@Base 2.46.0 - rsvg_rust_handle_set_dpi_x@Base 2.46.0 - rsvg_rust_handle_set_dpi_y@Base 2.46.0 + rsvg_rust_handle_set_dpi_x_y@Base 2.48.5 rsvg_rust_handle_set_size_callback@Base 2.46.0 rsvg_rust_handle_set_stylesheet@Base 2.47.3 rsvg_rust_handle_set_testing@Base 2.46.0 Doesn't his break the current ABI? Those seem to be public symbols that are being removed. Doesn't this warrant a librsvg soname bump, to something like librsvg2-3 or something? I'm worried about this breaking existing applications. Was this investigated? Am I just being overly paranoid? ** Changed in: librsvg (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884326 Title: SRU the current 2.48.7 stable update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1884326/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs