> I am struggling to find any use cases where GNOME's VNC should be preferred to RDP.
1) Teacher screen broadcasting to students. There, a shared VNC session is much easier to setup and performs better than separate RDP sessions. Additionally, encrypting e.g. 10 RDP streams comes with significant CPU strain, which is unnecessary in this use case. 2) The remote support use case. To help a remote user behind NAT, I only need to ask them to run `x11vnc -connect my-ip`. On my side, `vncviewer -listen` accepts the request for help. GNOME VNC could easily support that. But there's no `xfreerdp -listen` option in the RDP protocol. So in the RDP solution, the very frequent and significant "remote support" use case is completely ignored and we need to switch to teamviewer or anydesk instead. It's understandable though that if upstream GNOME neglects VNC, downstream Ubuntu will also do the same. And such decisions are why there's a growing list of users that can't use GNOME at all anymore... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987159 Title: Drop VNC support from GNOME Remote Desktop in Kinetic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1987159/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
