On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 19:30 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > > As GConf supports pluggable backends now, I wouldn't be surprised if a > prototype database backend could be hacked up in a day. > > Why wait for DConf (assuming it actually fixes the other problems and > doesn't end up being another system which has no advantage over the DBus > port of GConf) when GConf has the framework needed now?
I would say the mmap cache is a better idea, because it's kind of a complicated headache and a half to migrate to a new config format and we should try to avoid it until we're getting larger advantages such as a shared config system that fixes some of the gconf flaws. Havoc _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
