On 7/13/05, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is that necessarily > > going to please 100% of ISVs? No. (Possibly not even 50%.) Will it be > > useful anyway? IMHO, yes. While we should definitely get Bryan's input > > and attempt to accomodate it as much as practicable, lets please not > > bog this down by aiming to please the iron-clad expectations of very > > serious ISVs when the current state is so abysmal for *all* consumers > > of GNOME libraries. > > Yeah, but you know as well as I do, that those serious ISVs are exactly > the people we need to target - and well, without those iron-clad > expectations, we won't get a foot in the door.
Yes, but I think the difference of opinion is not the end goal, rather just how much we think we can handle right now. Personally, I think of these certification steps as a milestone towards meeting more iron-clad expectations. I think you are right that we need to keep the larger goal in mind, but I agree with Luis that we need to start smaller or risk getting unrealistic (for now) requirements that do more damage than good. :) Cheers, Elijah _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list