"Banginwar, Rajesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am really glad to see the intention of keeping the ABI same even with > 3.0 release. > > As we are going to include GTK 2.4 or 2.6 (based on distro feedback; > e.g. Redhat ships with 2.4) in the first release of desktop module of > LSB, having ABI compatibility even after platform consolidation is a > welcome decision.
Good to hear. This project should help that process by moving functionality out of unsupportable libraries into GTK+, as well as getting the code supported. > We are currently in the process of defining the set of ABI to be > included in LSB. It will be helpful if gtk+ community can provide the > feedback as to what interfaces should be kept out. Should we exclude any > interfaces in addition to the ones currently deprecated in 2.6? We are > planning on publishing the list of these interfaces over next few weeks. As far as I know, we didn't deprecate any symbols in GTK+-2.8. It's early yet for GTK+-2.10, but the only widget I know of in GTK+ that has functionality targeted by Ridley is GtkHandleBox. I think the deprecated list in 2.6 should be sufficient. Thanks, -Jonathan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
