Le lundi 16 janvier 2006 à 13:52 -0700, Elijah Newren a écrit : > On 1/16/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > They could use basic triaging in the sense that someone should go > > > through them and see what applies to the 0.10 version. I think that > > > you'd find most GStreamer bug triagers to mark them as obsolete if they > > > apply only to the 0.8 backend though, and I don't know if that's what > > > you want in this case. > > > > I don't think marking them as obsolete is okay right now. I'd use the > > status whiteboard so we can easily know they're only happening with the > > 0.8 backend. (Or maybe create a gstreamer0.8 component, but this is > > ugly). > > See http://blogs.gnome.org/view/newren/2005/09/30/0 for more details > where I'm coming from, but I'm basically going to disagree with > Vincent here -- I think it should be perfectly fine to mark all those > bugs as obsolete and tell the reporter they are free to reopen if they > experience the same issue under 0.10. I think which versions are > considered obsolete ought to be up to the maintainers (though we'd > appreciate a note in the product specific guidelines, linked to from > the browse page in bugzilla, so that triagers can help). There is a > tradeoff that needs to be made and we don't want to be too agressive > just closing out 'old' bugs, but I think we tend to err far on the > side off keeping too many bugs open that just aren't helpful.
Well, the question is: is GStreamer 0.8 totally unmaintained? I had understood that Ronald was planning to make a new release with some fixes, so that's why I proposed to not close the bugs. But I'm of course okay to close the bugs if Ronald don't need them... Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list