<quote who="Elijah Newren"> > I kind of like the idea of referring to the minor and micro version number > of Gnome as its version number. The 2 is understood (by the developers) > and people tend to call e.g. "2.14" a major release anyway, so we might as > well call our next version "Gnome 16" publically. But, I doubt most would > agree...
It introduces a problem with the odd minor number semantics, but that might be solvable [1]. It also begs the question... "What happens when we do bump the major number?" Start the next series at 3.20? That's not totally crazy. Though I made a joke about it in 2004, I don't think it's a terrible idea. But it should be well thought out before we do it. - Jeff [1] <danw> we're clever. we'd think of something. -- GUADEC 2006: Vilanova i la Geltrú, Spain http://2006.guadec.org/ Jeff: Whatchootalkin'boutwillis? Pia: What's Willis? _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
