On 4/22/06, Mark Rosenstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 00:28 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote: > > This situation is slightly different in that we're replacing > > functionality; my reaction would be that the small number of users still > > using 2.4 kernels can install battstat (hell, they've got it installed > > already; they just need to remember not to randomly delete it!). > > People usually use a package manager and upgrade their packages. A step > in this process is to remove the old files.
Are you aware of anyone packaging Gnome for any distro that uses linux-2.4.x? I'm not, and thus don't see the point in 2.4 kernels holding back our decision for new features/modules (especially since, as Andrew points out, the relevant users can use older deprecated/removed modules). My $0.02 anyway... _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list