On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 15:01 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: [snip] > Murray at the time posted the following eloquent email on this subject: > > > > What's the compelling reason to ship bindings? > > > Great apps. > > > > I personally think that "Great development environment" is a more > > compelling reason, given that the majority of software development is > > in-house stuff that will never be on distros. That really is a vast > > huge immense amount of unseen software.
More than once you have confused the acceptance of bindings with the acceptance of the use of those bindings in the desktop. My quote above does not contain this confusion. > The same applies here. > > I do not think there should be only "one way" of building applications > for Gnome. We would not have the official language bindings release if > we thought that only C code was worth having. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
