On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 10:12 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote: > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:58 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 08:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > And while there were almost no objections to Python, there are clearly > > > many objections to Mono. > > > > I used to have objections against the python bindings, but after those > > got splitup in pygtk, gnome-python, gnome-python-desktop and > > gnome-python-extras, I don't have big problems with it. > > > > Looking at mono, all of these bindings are in one package: gtk-sharp-2. > > I think, to get mono as accepted binding language, we should have a > > splitup similiar to the splitup that has been done to the python > > bindings. > > This is really just a packaging issue, on opensuse/SLED they are all > individual packages (glib-sharp, gtk-sharp, etc). > > -JP
On archlinux where we maintain a 1-1 relation on source and binary, we will have to do a manual splitup of these modules. There's no possible way of configuring anything with switches like --disable-gnomevfs, all modules present on the system get built by default. When I take a look at how nice the C++ bindings have been maintained for ages, I would wish to have such a system for the C# bindings too. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list