On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > These optional builds don't help much, unless people are using gentoo > (or other source-based distros). > > If the binary package was built with glade support then distros are > unlikely to change their binary package in the future to remove the > glade support. That would be an ABI break.
Seems like you're just being argumentative, now. Is the goal here to reinvent Gtk# in Gtkmm's image, or to satisfy the requirements of the release set? Last time I checked, libglade was a platform library. -- Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
