Sounds like a good 2.18 goal. On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 12:35 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 11:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > > * Are there other modules in our release that provide similar > > functionality? Then again, we did bless Gecko, even though > > we already had two HTML renderers. There are a bunch of > > spell checking libraries out there, so if we're going to > > bless one, we need to think hard about it. > > As far as all the spell checking libraries go, I think it's safe for us > to bless enchant as the API for applications to use. It modularly > supports all of the ispell/spell/etcspell... backends. And the actual > backend in use there, may depend on what language you're writing in, > as some don't have support for a particular language at all, while > others may only provide overlapping support. As far as the GUI side > goes we really only have GtkSpell and gnome-spell. As the latter uses > bonobo, it may well be worth our time to make Evolution use GtkSpell > instead, and work on ways to get GtkSpell into GTK+ proper, so that > any editing widgets on the desktop, can just inherently have spell > checking support. > > -- dobey > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list --
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list