On Sex, 2006-09-08 at 01:00 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:32 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote: > > > What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle? > > > > For one thing: the documentation gets squeezed. We (the doc team) have, > > basically, 3 month to document all the changes, update all the docs and > > add any new documentation needed. The doc team is currently running at > > skeleton staff and is working right up until the tarball submission > > deadline. This knocks on and means that the doc translations (if > > present) are invariably a release behind. > > > > Don > > /me now waits to see if shaunm will release his top-secret plan for > > world domination... > > Here is my much-anticipated MASTER PLAN:
Your master plan implies branching early and heavily committing to both branches for a long time. Reality check: we are still using this archaic software called C.V.S.! Branching with that software is incredibly complex. Your master plan is blocked by bug #99999999: "migration to subversion". -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The universe is always one step beyond logic. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list