Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 00:33 +0400, Maxim Udushlivy wrote:
>   
>> Havoc Pennington wrote:
>>     
>>> I think the best shot at this would be to gather a small group that 
>>> agrees on some audience they want to try and do stuff for, and just 
>>> start doing it; I'm not sure how the overall GNOME boat can be turned up 
>>> front, it's probably not possible. The small group would have to be 
>>> prepared for potentially large divergence from the existing 
>>> gnome-panel/nautilus/etc. desktop codebase - they would need to be open 
>>> to doing very different things either instead or in addition, if that 
>>> made sense to provide the benefits to the audience.
>>>   
>>>       
>> "...gather a small group" - this reminds the infamous lack-of-leadership 
>> Gnome problem (at least from the outsider perspective)
>>
>> I was once lurking around planet.gnome.org and there was an interesting 
>> accident. One guy said about Israel that "it is evil" and another (Jeff 
>> Waugh?) was trying to moderate him.
>>     
>
> I'm going off-topic for the list, but I don't want any
> misinformation to spread.  I don't remember who it was
> that wanted political opinion silenced on the planet,
> but it absolutely was not Jeff.  The whole idea of the
> blog aggregator (and it was pretty much all his idea)
> is to let people see the personal lives of the people
> who make Gnome work.
>
> --
> Shaun
>   
May be "was trying" sounds a bit negative, but I completely support Jeff 
reply regardless of who asked him to do that.

Many people read planet.gnome; it's a public place, not a private home 
page. There is a good saying: where the freedom of another person 
starts, mine ends. Political propaganda limits freedom of the mind 
(there is a choice to completely ignore planet.gnome of course).

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to